Newsletters
Dear Fellow Australians, 1/11/1999
Today, in the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Justice Smart refused to allow the 28
days as laid down in the High Court Rules (Order 9A) that a Defendant has in which to file for Special Leave to Appeal in the High Court following an adverse ruling in the Court of Appeal.
Instead he supported Justice
Wood's setting of a date for the hearing of a charge of contempt for the 9th November ... 1 day after the upcoming hearing in the Court of Appeal for Leave to Appeal against Justice Sully's ruling that my claim to a
right to "a fair and public hearing before a competent, independent and impartial tribunal" as required by the United Nations' Covenant on Civil and Political Rights was "wholly and transparently without
merit either in law or in fact".
Justice Smart rejected the right a person has to trial by jury.
Justice Smart has decided that the Court of Appeal will rule against me on 8/11/99 and I am not have the
statutory 28 days.
Justice Smart has decided that I am not entitled to equality before the law.
It is painfully obvious that Australian judges fear a jury because they fear the truth being told to a tribunal of
the people.
Justice Smart delayed and delayed hearing my Motion until after lunch and no amount of argument would change what he had been told to do by the Judicial Mafia in that lunch break.
Next Monday, the
8th November at 2:30 pm in the Court of Appeal, Queen's Square, Sydney (File no. 40731/99 John Wilson v The Prothonotary) more Australia judges will hear my Application for Leave to Appeal - and - there is little
doubt the Judicial Mafia will dictate the outcome.
Australian judges are liars, criminals and traitors....(see http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au)... and they have no intention of relinquishing their illegitimately
acquired absolute power to conceal their transgressions.
They have already overridden every Charter and Statute (eg: Magna Carta, Bill of Rights, Habeas Corpus, the Australian Constitution, the
Judiciary Act, etc., etc.) to deny trial by jury.
Now they are overridding International Law to protect themselves.
Please come to the Queen's Square Law Courts Building on Monday 8th November to
witness judicial corruption in all its contempt for Right and Justice!
Come and see what species of person preside in our courts and arrogantly hold themselves to be above the law - or, as they phrase it -
"immune from suit"!
Come and see how these persons regard the oaths to which they have said "So Help Me God"!
Monday 8th November at 2:30 pm.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
Dear Fellow Australians, 6/11/1999
At 9:45am on Monday 8th November in the Court of Appeal, Queens' Square, Sydney, the
Prothonotary (Clerk of the Supreme Court) will move that my request for trial by jury be denied - against all the Charters and Statutes which have formed the foundation for English Justice, ie: Magna Carta, Bill of Rights,
Habeas Corpus, Petition of Right, etc..
I have attached a leaflet summarizing those Acts that I made up some time ago.
Because Australian judges (including those in the High Court) have rejected all those
Charters, they have broken our laws to protect themselves.
The leaflet does not include Article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights which says that "all persons are equal before the
law" and "everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal". This International Law provides the path to go beyond the corrupted courts of Australia and
on to the UN's Human Rights Commission - which I must now do.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
Dear Fellow Australians on the Neither Network, 08/11/1999
Today in the Court of Appeal Registrar Jupp did as he was told by the Judicial Mafia and set the hearing of my Summons for Leave to Appeal (against the denial by other judges in the Supreme & High Courts to trial by jury) back to 13th December 1999.
This is another of their ploys to frustrate justice because tomorrow the Supreme Court, with Chief Justice Wood presiding, will hear the charge of contempt of court against me. It's railroading at its most pernicious.
The Summons to the Court Appeal includes a section 78B Notice of a Constitutional Matter describing how the Australian Constitution and, therefore, Australian Parliaments and Courts lost their legal foundation when Australia ceased to be a colony under the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom and became an independent and sovereign nation by signing the Treaty of Versailles and taking its place in the Assembly of the League of Nations - later to be the United Nations.
No new Constitution was created for the new nation of Australia in 1919 and none has been done since.
This will be put to Chief Justice Wood tomorrow but I expect him to ignore it and procede with his "kangaroo court".
I expect to be convicted and very likely imprisoned tomorrow. There is nothing as ruthless as a corrupt judge.
For background to this story please look into http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au
Tomorrow, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Queen's Square, Sydney courtroom 10A at 10 am (The Prothonotary v John Wilson, File No: 12914 of 1997).
If I don't send out an email tomorrow night, I will be in goal for a period of time "at the judge's pleasure" for trying to expose judicial corruption to a jury.
Thank you for your time.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
Follow up 08/11/1988
Dear Fellow Australians,
I arrived home tonight to find a letter from the UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR
HUMAN RIGHTS,
Address: Palais Des Nations, CH-1211 GENEVE 10
Telefax: (41-22)91 9011
Telegrams: UNATIONS,GENEVE
Telex: 41 29 62
Telephone: (41-22)-917 9241
Internet: www.unhchr.ch
E-mail: .hchr@unog.ch
The letter reads: "Dear Mr. Wilson, In reply to your letter of 8
September 1999, I have the honour to inform you that Australia is a State party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and as such bound to ensure and guarantee the rights contained in the Covenant to its
citizens and other persons under its jurisdiction. Whether or not you can invoke the Covenant rights directly before the Courts and other State authorities is a matter of domestic legislation which I cannot answer.
For
information, please find enclosed a copy of a brochure explaining the work of the Human Rights Committee, which supervises the implementation of the ICCPR.
Yours sincerely,
Hamid Graham
Officer in charge
Support Services Branch."
I will attempt to read this out in the Supreme Court of New South Wales
tomorrow morning before Chief Justice Wood
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
Site researched and written by J. Wilson jhwilson@acay.com.au and is best viewed with a screen resolution of 600 x 800ppi
or better, using Netscape or MSIE version 4.0 browsers or higher. © 2000
.